[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$f1gbcr2btqha03":3,"$f2v0uozlmm976r":15,"seo:zh-cn:\u002Fcrimes\u002FCR-354-%E5%AE%B9%E7%95%99%E4%BB%96%E4%BA%BA%E5%90%B8%E6%AF%92%E7%BD%AA":136},{"contact":4,"home":8,"notice":12,"footer":14},{"hotline":5,"wechat_qr":5,"work_hours":6,"callback_promise":7},"","09:00-21:00","30 分钟内回电（工作时间）",{"hot_crimes":9,"featured_cases":10,"recommended_lawyers":11},[],[],[],{"text":5,"enabled":13},false,{"icp":5,"address":5,"company":5},{"type":16,"title":17,"slug":18,"summary":19,"body":20,"cover":20,"author_type":21,"firm_id":20,"status":22,"visibility":23,"version":24,"published_at":25,"seo":26,"id":27,"created_at":28,"updated_at":28,"crime":29,"_locale":39,"_fallback":13,"tags":40,"related":41},"crime","容留他人吸毒罪","CR-354-容留他人吸毒罪","容留他人吸毒罪（《刑法》第354条）的构成要件、立案标准、量刑与辩护要点。",null,"editor","published","public",1,"2026-10-22T11:48:41.994537+00:00",{},"aef006ba-c2c2-4f23-b090-f7015087d1de","2026-10-22T11:48:42.209552+00:00",{"crime_code":18,"name":17,"chapter":30,"section":20,"law_articles":31,"definition":20,"elements":33,"filing_standard":20,"sentencing_tiers":34,"defense_points":35,"judicial_interpretations":20,"faq":36,"related_crimes":37,"is_hot":13,"sort":38,"_locale":39,"_fallback":13},"第六章 妨害社会管理秩序罪",[32],"刑法第354条",{},[],[],[],[],61,"zh-CN",[],{"cases":42,"faqs":76,"laws":77,"documents":134,"lawyers":135},[43,61],{"type":44,"title":45,"slug":46,"summary":47,"cover":20,"author_type":48,"firm_id":20,"status":22,"visibility":23,"version":49,"published_at":50,"seo":51,"id":52,"created_at":53,"updated_at":54,"case":55,"_locale":39,"_fallback":13,"tags":60},"case","舒某某涉嫌容留他人吸毒罪，经智豪律师辩护成功取保候审","zh-34633","一、案情简介 舒某某，四川人，在某酒吧内担任服务员工作，因酒吧包房内多人吸毒，吸毒人员在被公安机关查获后，其作为酒吧工作人员带到派出所接受调查，后被列为犯罪嫌疑人，第二天被重庆市某公安分局刑事拘留，羁押于某区 看守所 。 二、律师辩护 辩护…","firm",2,"2017-08-25T00:00:00+00:00",{},"088adba0-4ca3-4f85-bf7b-469aea125be1","2026-10-22T13:24:30.425632+00:00","2026-10-23T12:55:19.541876+00:00",{"crime_codes":56,"stage":20,"result":57,"result_detail":20,"amount_range":20,"region_code":20,"region_name":20,"court":20,"judgment_date":20,"lawyer_ids":58,"is_major":13,"facts":59,"issues":20,"strategy":20,"outcome":20,"desensitized":13,"_locale":39,"_fallback":13},[18],"取保候审",[],"\u003Cstrong>一、案情简介\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr\u002F>\n舒某某，四川人，在某酒吧内担任服务员工作，因酒吧包房内多人吸毒，吸毒人员在被公安机关查获后，其作为酒吧工作人员带到派出所接受调查，后被列为犯罪嫌疑人，第二天被重庆市某公安分局刑事拘留，羁押于某区看守所。\u003Cbr\u002F>\n\u003Cstrong>二、律师辩护\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr\u002F>\n辩护律师在会见舒某某后，至承办侦查机关交换意见，为其递交取保候审申请书。根据智豪律师了解的情况，本案中舒某某仅仅是一个服务员，并非酒吧业主，其在酒吧的工作均受上级领导安排，对是否容留他人吸毒没有决策权。此外，本案中吸毒人员吸食毒品均属其自带，舒某某等人并没有向其提供，主观恶性较小。并且，舒某某虽然对涉案场所有人吸毒的事实具有主观明知，但其并没有为其提供任何实质性或形式上的帮助。在案件侦查阶段，辩护人向公安机关提交了多分书面法律意见，并就案件事实与办案单位沟通。提出本案中嫌疑人不具有犯罪的主观故意，并且舒某某的确没有向吸毒人员提供帮助，其在本案中只是一个证人地位，不应该被列入犯罪嫌疑人之列。同时，就舒某某涉嫌犯罪的情节来看，即使认定舒某某构成犯罪，其的犯罪情节也十分轻微，即便案件被移送至检察院审查起诉，舒某某也极有可能不被提起公诉。综合以上几点，智豪律师从定罪的证据不足，以及舒某某应受刑罚可能性很低的角度，向侦查机关提出了取保候审、撤销案件的申请。\u003Cbr\u002F>\n\u003Cstrong>三、案件结果\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr\u002F>\n取保候审，予以撤案。\u003Cbr\u002F>\n\u003Cstrong>四、关联法律法规\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003Cbr\u002F>\n    《刑法》第三百五十四条　【容留他人吸毒罪】容留他人吸食、注射毒品的，处三年以下有期徒刑、拘役或者管制，并处罚金。\u003Cbr\u002F>",[],{"type":44,"title":62,"slug":63,"summary":64,"cover":20,"author_type":48,"firm_id":20,"status":22,"visibility":23,"version":49,"published_at":65,"seo":66,"id":67,"created_at":68,"updated_at":69,"case":70,"_locale":39,"_fallback":13,"tags":75},"王某某涉嫌容留他人吸毒，成功变更强制措施后结案","zh-24955","一、案情简介 嫌疑人王某某，KTV服务员。某日，公安机关在该KTV的包间内查获一群人在聚众吸食毒品，据此，将王某某作为容留他人吸毒的犯罪嫌疑人予以刑事拘留。 二、接受委托 王某某被刑事拘留后，家属非常着急。得知重庆智豪律师事务所是一家专门办…","2016-07-28T00:00:00+00:00",{},"0117a3aa-e7ee-4dae-8c55-57663411efc8","2026-10-22T13:29:40.538082+00:00","2026-10-23T12:55:30.848949+00:00",{"crime_codes":71,"stage":20,"result":72,"result_detail":20,"amount_range":20,"region_code":20,"region_name":20,"court":20,"judgment_date":20,"lawyer_ids":73,"is_major":13,"facts":74,"issues":20,"strategy":20,"outcome":20,"desensitized":13,"_locale":39,"_fallback":13},[18],"缓刑",[],"一、案情简介\u003Cbr\u002F>\n嫌疑人王某某，KTV服务员。某日，公安机关在该KTV的包间内查获一群人在聚众吸食毒品，据此，将王某某作为容留他人吸毒的犯罪嫌疑人予以刑事拘留。\u003Cbr\u002F>\n二、接受委托\u003Cbr\u002F>\n王某某被刑事拘留后，家属非常着急。得知重庆智豪律师事务所是一家专门办理刑事案件且具有相当知名度的律所后，专程前来咨询。通过与智豪律师的交流沟通，家属非常满意智豪律师的咨询法律意见。决定正式委托智豪律所代理王某某涉嫌容留他人吸毒一案的辩护工作。\u003Cbr\u002F>\n三、辩护工作开展\u003Cbr\u002F>\n1、会见：智豪律所接受委托后，指派经验丰富的资深律师承办该案。承办律师于指派后的24小时内就前往看守所会见了王某某。之后，随着案件的进展，承办律师又多次前往看守所会见王某某沟通了解案情。\u003Cbr\u002F>\n2、变更强制措施：承办律师在首次会见王某某后，通过了解到的案情及王某某的个人及家庭情况，立即向办案单位提交变更强制措施申请。\u003Cbr\u002F>\n3、沟通、交换意见：承办律师根据了解到的案情，认为王某某的行为不构成容留他人吸毒，具体为：首先，容留他人吸毒罪的主观方面为故意，即明知对方吸毒而提供场所。本案中，作为桥缘KTV服务员王某某，他不负责组织和安排人员前来消费娱乐。其工作范围仅是在老板通知其有客人来时，才去KTV提供常规服务。具体来的客人有多少，是些什么人，都是老板在组织安排。桥缘KTV本身作为一个娱乐场所，其包房内有用于客人娱乐的唱歌设施设备和沙发茶几，客人进入包房后，具体在里面进行唱歌或其他娱乐活动，作为服务员的王某某不可能清楚。因包房属于客人买断性质，其具有一定的私密性，只有当客人按铃需要服务时，作为服务员的王某某才能进入包房进行服务。因此，王某某在主观上不明知前来KTV娱乐的客人除唱歌外还聚众吸毒。也不能从王某某偶然看到客人的行为而推断其知道客人行为的性质；其次，容留他人吸毒罪犯罪构成的客观方面，其客观的“容留”是为他人提供场所的行为，并且法律要求场所的提供人是对该场所具备管理权的人，包含所有人、租用人、借用人等。本案中，桥缘KTV这一经营场所既非嫌疑人王某某所有，也非其租用或借用；最后，根据我国《禁毒法》第六十五条之规定，只有娱乐场所的经营管理人员在明知场所内发生聚众吸毒、注射毒品或者贩毒活动，不向公安机关报告的，依照该条规定给予行政处罚，构成犯罪的依法追究刑事责任。本案中，王某某的身份为KTV的服务员，非经营管理人员，这是客观事实。综上所述，辩护律师认为嫌疑人王某某的主观思想和客观行为以及主体身份方面均不符合容留他人吸毒罪的法律构成要件。\u003Cbr\u002F>\n四、工作结果\u003Cbr\u002F>\n承办律师通过多次不断与办案人员沟通，提出的现有证据不能证明王某某在主观明知的情况下，实施了容留他人吸毒的行为的意见被办案单位采纳。最终，在羁押30天后，王某某被变更强制措施为监视居住。后监视居住期满，办案单位撤销案件不再追加王某某的刑事责任。王某某及其家人对智豪律师据理力争的这一结果非常满意，由衷的说“请智豪，没得错”。\u003Cbr\u002F>\n \u003Cbr\u002F>",[],[],[78,116],{"type":79,"title":80,"slug":81,"summary":82,"cover":20,"author_type":21,"firm_id":20,"status":22,"visibility":23,"version":24,"published_at":83,"seo":84,"id":85,"created_at":86,"updated_at":87,"law":88,"_locale":39,"_fallback":13,"tags":115},"law","最高人民法院 最高人民检察院关于常见犯罪的量刑指导意见（试行）","law-liangxing-zhidao-yijian","规范性文件，自 2021-07-01 起施行。","2026-10-23T01:49:26.159836+00:00",{},"2de90a2c-b798-447a-a14c-ddba8933b170","2026-10-23T01:49:26.158764+00:00","2026-10-23T12:57:51.129712+00:00",{"law_code":89,"article_no":20,"issuer":90,"effective_date":91,"repealed_date":20,"crime_codes":92,"_locale":39,"_fallback":13},"量刑指导意见","最高人民法院 最高人民检察院","2021-07-01",[93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,18,114],"CR-133-交通肇事罪","CR-133之一-危险驾驶罪","CR-176-非法吸收公众存款罪","CR-192-集资诈骗罪","CR-196-信用卡诈骗罪","CR-224-合同诈骗罪","CR-234-故意伤害罪","CR-236-强奸罪","CR-238-非法拘禁罪","CR-263-抢劫罪","CR-264-盗窃罪","CR-266-诈骗罪","CR-X-抢夺罪","CR-271-职务侵占罪","CR-274-敲诈勒索罪","CR-277-妨害公务罪","CR-292-聚众斗殴罪","CR-293-寻衅滋事罪","CR-312-掩饰、隐瞒犯罪所得、犯罪所得收益罪","CR-347-走私、贩卖、运输、制造毒品罪","CR-348-非法持有毒品罪","CR-359-引诱、容留、介绍卖淫罪",[],{"type":79,"title":117,"slug":118,"summary":119,"cover":20,"author_type":21,"firm_id":20,"status":22,"visibility":23,"version":24,"published_at":120,"seo":121,"id":122,"created_at":123,"updated_at":124,"law":125,"_locale":39,"_fallback":13,"tags":133},"最高人民法院关于审理毒品犯罪案件适用法律若干问题的解释","law-毒品犯罪解释","司法解释，共 14 条，自 2016-04-11 起施行。","2026-10-23T01:49:25.362402+00:00",{},"48c2705b-745f-4e76-9cfd-878bedb751fc","2026-10-23T01:49:25.360453+00:00","2026-10-23T10:44:37.775412+00:00",{"law_code":126,"article_no":127,"issuer":128,"effective_date":129,"repealed_date":20,"crime_codes":130,"_locale":39,"_fallback":13},"毒品犯罪解释","14 条","最高人民法院","2016-04-11",[112,113,131,132,18],"CR-X-窝藏、转移、隐瞒毒品、毒赃罪","CR-351-非法种植毒品原植物罪",[],[],[],{"path":137,"locale":39,"title":138,"description":139,"keywords":140,"og_image":20,"canonical":20,"noindex":13,"extra":141,"id":142,"created_at":28,"updated_at":28},"tpl:crimes:detail","{name}立案标准与量刑_{name}辩护律师_刑辩通","{name}（{article}）的构成要件、立案标准、量刑档次、辩护要点与相关案例，在线咨询专业{name}辩护律师。","{name},{name}立案标准,{name}量刑,{name}律师",{},"8845f6bd-f600-4f9c-b145-3cfa56bfdc70"]